<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DOCSIS 3.0 &#187; Time Warner Cable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.docsis-30.com/tag/time-warner-cable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.docsis-30.com</link>
	<description>Superfast Internet Transmission</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:13:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Time Warner Cable &#8220;No DOCSIS 3.0&#8243; We Put It On Hold Because You Said No Bandwidth Caps!</title>
		<link>http://www.docsis-30.com/time-warner-cable-no-docsis-30-we-put-it-on-hold-because-you-said-no-bandwidth-caps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.docsis-30.com/time-warner-cable-no-docsis-30-we-put-it-on-hold-because-you-said-no-bandwidth-caps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>polszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOCSIS resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Docsis 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner Cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wideband service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docsis-30.com/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TWC No Bandwidth Cap, No Wideband! I am twice happy that I do not live in an area where Time Warner Rules. But Even if I did, I think I will not be having their internet service that they call broadband. In any case 5GB monthly cap they suggested while back was the crux of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://snapvoip.blogspot.com/2009/04/time-warner-cable-no-docsis-30-we-put.html"><span style="color: #666666;">TWC No Bandwidth Cap, No Wideband!</span></a><br />
I am twice happy that I do not live in an area where Time Warner Rules. But Even if I did, I think I will not be having their internet service that they call broadband. In any case <strong>5GB</strong> monthly cap they suggested while back was the crux of road runner crap!<br />
But now they seem to be laying more crap so their customers can stp on. According to Alex Dudley, VP of public relations for <a href="http://www.timewarner.com/corp/" target="_blank">Time Warner</a>, the wideband service, DOCSIS 3.0, is on hold because they could not launch tiered pricing. Time Warner planned to roll out both the services at the same time, therefore they are both on hold now.<br />
Dudley on his twitter feed;<br />
&#8220;@netpro2k It doesn&#8217;t&#8230;just that the rollout was scheduled with the trial and now all of it is on hold&#8221;<br />
@AlexTWC<br />
He has also mentioned that the biggest cost associated with wideband roll-out is bandwidth allocation. Are sure it is not per house passed? I read some where that it costs us some where around $750 per house passed USA while Japanese do it for $20. I think what they refer to as bandwidth allocation is the infrastructure upgrade. They want you to pay for their network setup? I think the wolf is catching up!<span id="intellitxt"> </span>source: snapvoip.blogspot.com</p>
<p>All the while, <a href="http://snapvoip.blogspot.com/2008/10/comcast-announces-more-bandwidth-for.html"><span style="color: #225588;">Comcast started rolling out DOCSIS 3.0</span></a> last year, <!-- start ziffarticle //-->announcing this Tuesday that it had expanded into the San Francisco Peninsula<!-- end ziffarticle //-->. Yes Show them how it is done!</p>
<p>source: snapvoip.blogspot.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.docsis-30.com/time-warner-cable-no-docsis-30-we-put-it-on-hold-because-you-said-no-bandwidth-caps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Warner Cable Putting Superfast DOCSIS 3.0 Internet On Hold</title>
		<link>http://www.docsis-30.com/time-warner-cable-putting-superfast-docsis-30-internet-on-hold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.docsis-30.com/time-warner-cable-putting-superfast-docsis-30-internet-on-hold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 07:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>polszewski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOCSIS resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Docsis 3.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiered pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner Cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TWC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wideband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.docsis-30.com/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like the folks at TWC are bad losers. They are now considering dropping the planned rollout of DOCSIS 3.0high speed citing that it was part of their plan for consumption based billing. In other words, if they are not going to get the blood money they planned from CBB, they might not feel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the folks at <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?client=ob&amp;q=NYSE:TWC" target="_blank">TWC </a>are bad losers. They are now considering dropping the planned rollout of <strong>DOCSIS 3.0</strong>high speed citing that it was part of their plan for consumption based billing.</p>
<p>In other words, if they are not going to get the blood money they planned from <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?client=ob&amp;q=NYSE:CBB" target="_blank">CBB</a>, they might not feel the need to roll out wideband (even though they are not implicitly tied). Alex Dudley, VP of public relations for Time Warner explains via his twitter feed:</p>
<p>@gigastacey it was scheduled as part of cbb trial, but we all know how you feel about that.</p>
<p>@netpro2k It doesn&#8217;t&#8230;just that the rollout was scheduled with the trial and now all of it is on hold.</p>
<p>@Stryph Biggest cost is actually bandwidth allocation.</p>
<p>Obviously, if they are concerned about another major public backlash, they had damn well better come through with this. As a <strong>TWC customer</strong>, I will definitely be one of those people shaking my fist. <strong>[PCMag]</strong></p>
<p>source: gizmodo.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.docsis-30.com/time-warner-cable-putting-superfast-docsis-30-internet-on-hold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
